Thoughts on Poetry and the Evolution of Language #amwriting

I think of poetry and language as coming into existence as conjoined twins. I can remember anything I can set to a rhyme or make into a song.

Yet, much of the time, modern songs and poetry don’t rhyme. Even so, they have tempo and rhythm.

If it doesn’t rhyme, what makes poetry “poetic?” And where does it fit into modern narrative prose?

Poetry is a primal form of communication in the human species, the literary invention that emerged as soon as we had words. It presents thoughts and feelings as abstractions and allusions rather than the concrete.

Poets select words for the impact they deliver. An entire story must be conveyed using the least number of words possible. For that reason, choices are made for symbolism, power, and syllabic cadence, even if there is no rhyme involved.

Narrative prose is broader, looser, more all-encompassing, with no limit on how long it takes for the story to unfold.

Modern humans deliver highly detailed concepts and ideas with packets of noise formed into individual words. We learn the meanings of these sound-packets as infants. By stringing these meaningful sound-packets together, we can share information with others of our species.

I suspect using rhyme as a mnemonic is fundamental to human nature. Research with modern primates in the wild proves that, while we were still in Africa before the great diaspora, humans developed complex languages within our tribal communities.

By observing primates in the wild, we see that our earliest ancestors had the ability to describe the wider world to their children. With that, we could teach them skills and the best ways to acquire food.

We understood and were able to see the motives of another person.

We developed compassion and burial rites.

Early humans relied on the cadence of repetition and rhyme. They could explain the how and why of a great flood or any other natural disaster, passing it forward across many generations.

The availability of food is central to the prosperity of all life, not just humans. Our ancestors saw the divine in every aspect of life, especially around the abundance or scarcity of food. They developed mythologies combining all of these concepts to explain the world around us and our place in it.

With the ability to pass on knowledge of toolmaking, we had leisure to contemplate the world. We discussed these things while eating and sharing food with each other.

We now know that other primates also deliver information by using sound-packets. Gorillas have been observed singing during their meals. Humans have always sung.

Chimpanzees and Bonobos have been observed chatting during leisurely meals.

We humans love to sit around the table and chat.

The larynx and vocal cords of each primate species are formed differently, which affects how they communicate. They understand each other perfectly, but because they are so different from us, our human ears can’t differentiate the meanings of the individual sound-packets that make up their calls.

To us, their communications are just mindless screeching, and so we have always assumed they must not be self-aware.

I suspect that in years to come we will find that we have been wrong. We may be the only species we reliably converse with, but we are not the only self-aware species who communicate through vocalizations.

For many humans, dogs and cats are their beloved family members, self-aware people who love and accept them like no one else does.

This brings me to another point – if we can’t figure out and understand the languages of the other intelligent creatures in this world, i.e., Elephants, Cetaceans, and other Primates, then how can we ever expect to communicate with an alien extraterrestrial being?

And if we can’t recognize, value, and protect the individual self-awareness and personhood of beings like Elephants, Cetaceans, and other Primates, how will we recognize an extraterrestrial life-form? How will we behave toward them? After all, to us, these fellow creatures of earth have been nothing but resources for us to exploit.

Like modern Great Apes, proto humans used rhyme and cadence to memorize and pass on ideas as abstract as legends or sagas to their children and to others they might meet in friendly circumstances. By handing down those stories through the generations, we learned lessons from the mistakes and heroism of our ancestors.

Rhyme and cadence were fundamental to our ability to make tools out of stone and bone. The capacity to learn, remember, and reliably pass on knowledge was why the three human genomes we call Homo Sapiens, Neanderthal, and Denisovan could master fire. This is why they could develop the tools that made them the apex predators we became. We could reliably feed our young, rear them to adulthood, and still have time to create art on the walls of caves.

Every tribe, every culture that ever arose in our world, had a tradition of passing down stories and legends using rhyme and meter. Rhyme, combined with repetition and rhythmic simplicity, enabled us to remember and pass on our histories and knowledge to our children.

In times gone by, writers used words for their beauty, employing them the way they decorated their homes. Authors labored over their sentences, ensuring each word was placed in such a way as to be artistic as well as impactful.

In writing poetry, we are forced to think on an abstract level. We must choose words based on their power. The emotions these words evoke, and the way they show the environment around us is why I gravitate to narratives written by authors who are also poets—the creative use of words elevates what could be mundane to a higher level of expression. When it’s done subtly, the reader doesn’t consciously notice poetic derivations in prose, but they are moved by them.

We have no need to memorize our cultural knowledge anymore, just as we no longer need the ability to accurately tally long strings of numbers in our heads. Readers seek out books with straightforward prose and few descriptors. Words for the sake of words is no longer desirable to the modern reader.

Modern poetry has evolved too. The love of poetry continues, and new generations seek out the poems of the past while creating powerful poetry of their own.

Modern authors, such as Patrick Rothfuss in his novel, The Name of the Wind craft narratives packed with powerful, evocative prose. We eagerly read their work because it is both straightforward and poetic. Most readers are unaware that they are drawn to the subtle poetry of his work as much as to the story that unfolds within the narrative.

I write poetry, some that follow traditional rhyming, and much that does not. Regardless of the structure, the cadence of syllables and the words I choose are recognizably mine. The emotions they evoke and the way they portray the environment I imagine is what lends my voice to my work.

Authors like me who read and sometimes write speculative fiction can enjoy our modern stripped-down narratives, guilt free.

That said, we who love the rhythm and cadence of words can still appreciate beauty combined with impact when it comes to our prose. And, if you love dark, heroic speculative fiction and haven’t yet read The Name of the Wind, by Patrick Rothfuss, I highly recommend it.


Credits and Attributions:

Admiring the Galaxy |CCA 4.0 ESO/A. Fitzsimmons

12 Comments

Filed under writing

12 responses to “Thoughts on Poetry and the Evolution of Language #amwriting

  1. Johanna Flynn

    Love this blog!

    Like

  2. Stephen Swartz

    I think about all the words I’ve used
    Then about the words refused
    It all comes out soon enough
    As mumbo-jumbo or mere fluff
    Better than what I’ve usually mused

    Liked by 1 person

  3. A most interesting post. It strikes a chord with me because I wrote a post about animals and speech called Can Animals Talk. You can find it on https://aspholessaria.wordpress.com/2018/05/29/can-animals-talk-2
    Everyone knows what their cat or dog means when they make certain sounds. Isn’t that what talking is? making sounds that mean a specific thing?
    As to poetry, yes it is fundamental to passing on of knowledge. We learn mnemonics at school to help us remember and we almost never forget them. Take for example In 1492 Columbus sailed the ocean blue. I’d never remember what date Columbus set sail across the Atlantic without that.
    Poetry was the medium of many tales, too. Beowolf for example. And Shakespeare used it in his plays to tell the stories.
    There is one point I would take you up on, though. You say: Yet, much of the time, modern songs and poetry don’t rhyme. Even so, they have tempo and rhythm.
    It’s the latter that I take issue with. Some poems without rhyme do have rhythm. Poetry does not have to rhyme. I’ve written poetry without rhyme myself, but it does need rhythm or it’s just a piece of prose (poetic maybe) broken into lines. Many modern poems I’ve read recently could easily be written as a piece of prose and no one would know it was supposed to be a poem. It’s so much easier to do that than to struggle with metre and how many syllables you need. Find the word with the same meaning with just the right number of syllables or rewrite the whole stanza. Easier just to write your prose and arbitrarily break it into lines. (Separate lines are not even capitalised in many.) I don’t personally count these as poems.
    A poem must have, at the very least, a rhythm.

    Like

    • I agree, and as always, love your conversation and your thoughts! I find rhythm to be one of the more difficult aspects when trying to convey certain thoughts, and often I fail, or think I have it right, but it’s wrong. I think of works that have no cadence as monologues sung by the tone-deaf. Yes, even so, even without rhyme, the rhythm makes a poem. Thank you for taking the time to comment!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Thanks for a good post. I’d like to add that the early Greek philosophers though of philosophy and poetry as closely related, poetry preceding philosophy, which would mean poetry is the root to all modern science. And communicating with aliens might indeed be complicated. We can’t even communicate well amongst eachother 😀

    Liked by 1 person

    • A very good point about the early Greek philosophers. Interestingly, one of the rabbit holes I went down in prepping for a work-in-progress involved researching Plato’s theories of heaven and earth. I soon discovered there is no such thing as “light” research when you go down that trail.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.