The Quest for the Rare, Diamond Studded MacGuffin #amwriting

The nerve of some characters… lazy creatures.

Right now, my protagonist is staring at me. “What the heck is a MacGuffin, and why must I go searching for it?”

“Because,” I reply, “I’m the author, and I said so. You owe your very existence to me, and right now you’re doing nothing. I need to keep you busy and the plot moving forward. In your case, the MacGuffin is Dragon’s Milk, which your future mother-in-law, Queen Evilla, requires for some obscure reason. It should be placed in this diamond studded container.”

“Seriously? You want me to drag a diamond studded bucket through the seediest part of town just to milk a dragon?” Sir Rediculis is the only man I know who manages to look noble even when he pouts. “They do have that little issue of flaming breath? Remember that? Thanks to you, my armor no longer shines, no matter how I polish it.”

Oh, yeah… I do recall that scene. It was awesome, the way he nearly got fried. But it was his squire who really did the dirty work…  still, the hero must have a glorious task, and what could be more glorious than a diamond studded bucket of dragon’s milk?

So… ah ha!  I can have him cross the… but he could accidentally… which will give me the opportunity to promote Randall the Former Kitchen Boy turned Squire to Hero First Class. “Now, now, Rediculis. Be a good hero.” I embrace my hero one last time. “Big knights don’t whine. Princess Babs has her sword strapped on and is ready to go. Your squire has the map, and he’s ready too. Get out there and bring back my MacGuffin.”

Randall regularly fantasizes about spending a week or two trapped in a cave with Princess Babs, naughty boy that he is. Lucky for him he’s nimble, as fetching the MacGuffin will offer me the opportunity to write more hot scenes set in the Fiery Lair of Doom.

Both Randy and Babs are lots braver than this bad boy and they don’t mind a little dirt, so… note to self: have Sir Rediculis cross the Lake of Boiling Dragon Poo via the Rickety Rope Bridge…  heh heh… this is gonna be fun.

So, let’s talk about thin plot devices, or MacGuffins.

According to the Font of All Knowledge, Wikipedia: The MacGuffin technique is common in films, especially thrillers. Usually the MacGuffin is the central focus of the film in the first act, and thereafter declines in importance. It may reappear at the climax of the story but sometimes is actually forgotten by the end of the story. Multiple MacGuffins are sometimes derisively identified as plot coupons.[1][2]

The name “MacGuffin” was popularized by Alfred Hitchcock in the 1930s. The MacGuffin’s importance to the plot is not the object or goal itself, but rather the effect it has on the characters and their motivations. Many times, it is inserted into the narrative with little or no explanation, as the sole purpose of the MacGuffin is to move the plot forward.

If you are crafty about your plotting and careful how you portray your plot device, it ceases to be a MacGuffin and becomes a quest worthy of writing a story about. Hitchcock was the master at creating great, compelling stories around thin plot devices:

Quote from Wikipedia:  Hitchcock explained the term “MacGuffin” in a 1939 lecture at Columbia University in New York:

It might be a Scottish name, taken from a story about two men on a train. One man says, ‘What’s that package up there in the baggage rack?’ And the other answers, ‘Oh, that’s a MacGuffin’. The first one asks, ‘What’s a MacGuffin?’ ‘Well,’ the other man says, ‘it’s an apparatus for trapping lions in the Scottish Highlands.’ The first man says, ‘But there are no lions in the Scottish Highlands,’ and the other one answers, ‘Well then, that’s no MacGuffin!’ So you see that a MacGuffin is actually nothing at all.

Interviewed in 1966 by François Truffaut, Hitchcock explained the term “MacGuffin” using the same story.[8][9]

Hitchcock’s term “MacGuffin” helped him to assert that his films were in fact not what they appeared to be on the surface. 

Thus, the object of the quest might not be the purported “Maltese Falcon” after all, despite the obvious quest to acquire it. The true core of the story might really be the internal journeys of Sam Spade and Brigid O’Shaunessy, two people brought together by the quest, and whose lives are changed by it.

A good plot device emerges naturally, MacGuffin or not. Done well, it will be entirely accepted and perhaps even unnoticed for what it is by the reader. It can take the form of an object or person being pursued, often by both the protagonist and the antagonist. A good plot device can also be more intangible, perhaps the pursuit of love or power.

If the object of the quest is too outrageous or is inserted clumsily, the reader won’t be able to suspend their disbelief, and likely won’t finish the book.

Don’t let your MacGuffin become

Give the quest for the MacGuffin some closure. If the quest to acquire the MacGuffin is only meant to give the characters something to do while they are interacting and chemistry is happening, please, at least have it be a thread that continues throughout the entire story, as Dashiel Hammett did in The Maltese Falcon.


Sources and Attributions:

Wikipedia contributors, “MacGuffin,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MacGuffin&oldid=814738104  (accessed December 10, 2017).

St George and the Dragon, Gustave Moreau 1889-1890 [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Cover of the original novel “The Maltese Falcon” 1930 File:MalteseFalcon1930.jpg, Fair use

Advertisements

10 Comments

Filed under writing

10 responses to “The Quest for the Rare, Diamond Studded MacGuffin #amwriting

  1. Ahhh, Connie. You make me want to haul out some old first drafts, dust ’em off, and see what new miracles can occur. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Jasne

    That scene at the beginning was wonderful! Poor Sir Rediculis 😀
    On a side note: I feel like the greatest MacGuffin ever was the One Ring in LoTR. I mean, it did have a lot of explanation, but… ultimately it was just moving the plot along, yes. On reflection I’m a little dubious if Sauron getting that ring back would’ve been such a disaster – he’d already lost a war while having it.

    Like

    • I had thought about that, but technically the One Ring has a finite ending, falling into the volcano along with poor Smeagol, while the Maltese Falcon is not acquired by Sam Spade or Brigid. Other questors continue the search off camera, fading from the story and leaving Sam with no treasure and having to tie up the loose ends of Brigid’s criminal activity. But the ring is a macguffin in so many other ways.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Jasne

        Hmm, so you’re saying a true MacGuffin winds up so irrelevant doesn’t even have a closure? Maybe you’re right, One Ring doesn’t quite fit that definition. I guess I was looking it from the angle of “Sauron must not get it or else!”, which was a little… off. Its destruction, on the other hand, did cause massive consequences.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Right! And in the case of the Maltese Falcon, the fact they don’t acquire it is closure in a way, because the real story is the physical and mental chemistry between Sam and Brigid, and the fact he is on the side of the law, and she is a murderer. The story is about that, and the hunt for the statue is the means of bringing these two flawed, intriguing characters together.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jasne

        Wow, I missed so many words in that reply. Sorry! 😀

        Liked by 1 person

  3. So, I’ve thought of a McGuffin as a plot device, something inserted that has little to do with anything essential to the characters but that forces action to be taken (thus it will feel like it comes out of nowhere, or it will feel manipulative, or will feel like an obvious device). Maybe I don’t have this concept quite right? What do you think?

    Liked by 1 person

    • I think that is one aspect of it, and is why it can be a red herring, Chekhov’s gun, or a Deus Ex Machina if done clumsily. I think in Hitchcock’s work it was often a non-quest, just something for the characters to use as a jumpstarter. If I was going to finish Sir Rediculis’ story, the MacGuffin quest would be superseded by a larger, more important problem, and the MacGuffin would be forgotten.

      Like

  4. Thank you for that. Also, your Sir Rediculis story is very funny.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s