#NaNoPrep: Discovering your writing style #amwriting

Are you a ‘pantser’ or a ‘plotter?’ For me, the answer lies somewhere in the middle. I plot, get two paragraphs in, and then find myself winging it, and the plot goes in a new direction. Then I replot and let it fly again.

crows-clip art clicker vector dot comAlso, my first drafts are not written linearly. I write what I am inspired to, skipping the spots I have no clue about. I fill in those places later. Even after completing the first draft, things will change structurally with each rewrite.

But what if you aren’t interested in writing a novel? What if you are a poet or your best skill is the short story?

In thirteen years of participating in NaNoWriMo, I have discovered that there is no one way that fits everyone. You’ve had this idea rolling around your head for a while now for something you’d like to read. You wish your favorite author would write it. In my experience, you must write it yourself, or it will never happen.

Your favorite author can only write so fast. Not only that, but what they’re in the mood to write might not be your wished-for book.

I’ve noticed a trend—most authors don’t live beyond 100 years of age. Unfortunately, dead authors rarely publish new books unless they are ghostwriters.

So, there you go–if you want that book, write it yourself.

My addiction to NaNoWriMo began innocently, as all good habits do: A young writer in the Philippines whom I had met through a gaming website mentioned he planned to do this writing challenge. I had never heard of it.

nano-computer-word-count

November’s Goal

It was a worldwide thing where hundreds of thousands of people began writing a novel on November 1, intending to have it finished by November 30.  The catch was that you couldn’t start until 12:01 a.m. on November 1st; it had to be at least 50,000 words long, but it could be longer. And you had to have it validated by 11:59 p.m. on November 30th to earn the coveted winners’ goodies.

I wasn’t sure I could do this crazy thing. All I had to do was write 1,667 words daily, which I felt I could do. I figured the worst that could happen was that I would fail to have anything to write about.

Fear of failure had never stopped me from ruining my life, so I googled the national website and signed up. I chose the handle dragon_fangirl.

At 6:30 a.m. on November 1, 2010, I looked at my laptop and had no idea what to do. I wrote the first line as if I were telling myself a fairy tale. Inspired by my misspent childhood reading such disparate works as Don Quixote and the heartily misogynistic adventures of Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, I wrote:

There was a cabin in the woods.

Author-thoughtsIt wasn’t exactly literary brilliance, but it gave my idea a jumping-off point. I just began telling the story as it fell out of my mind. Surprisingly, I discovered my word count averaged 2,500 to 3,000 words daily. By day fifteen, I knew I would have no trouble getting to 50,000, and by November 21st, I had passed the 50,000-word mark.

At the 68,000-word point, I had completed my rollicking tale of snark and medieval derring-do. It was utterly unpublishable (say that hokey phrase three times!), but I didn’t know that until later.

What I did know was that I had written a complete novel and told the kind of tale I would have sought out at the bookstore.

All it needed was rewriting, editing, revising, rewriting, and putting it in a drawer, never to be seen again.

Julian_Lackland Cover 2019 for BowkersBut I took that incoherent mess apart, and over the next ten years, it became three books: Huw the Bard, Billy Ninefingers, and Julian Lackland.

One rule they tell you at NaNoWriMo is never to delete and don’t self-edit as you go along. This is all strictly stream-of-consciousness, so write how it falls out of your head. That was hard for me, but eventually, I got into the swing of things.

My rules for NaNoWriMo:

  1. Write at least 1,670 words every day. Technically, it’s three more words than the pros suggest, but it gives me a little cushion and takes about 2 hours. I’m not fast at this.
  2. Write daily whether you have an idea worth writing about or not. Write that grocery list if you have nothing else. When stuck, I work on my characters’ personnel files, visualizing them as people I might want to know. Every word counts toward your ultimate goal. We will talk about my approach to writer’s block next week.
  3. NANO CrestIt helps to check in on the national threads each day. Look at your regional threads on the national website to keep in contact with other local writers. You will find out when and where write-ins are scheduled.
  4. Be brave! Attend an in-person write-in or join a virtual write-in at NaNoWriMo on Facebook. The company of other writers keeps you enthused about your project.
  5. Try NOT to self-edit as you go. Just get that story down from beginning to end.
  6. Delete nothing. Passages you want to delete later can be highlighted, and the font turned to red or blue so you can easily separate them later.
  7. Remember, not every story is a novel. If your story ends, draw a line at the bottom of the page and start a new one in the same manuscript. You can always separate them later; that way, you won’t lose track of your total word count.
  8. Update your word count every day. It’s an honor system, but you get little badges for updating every day and achieving specific goals. One badge is for updating your word count more than once in one day. I try to earn all the badges, and most years I do.

In 2015, I took a different path from the usual novel-in-thirty-days approach. I named my project November Tales. I suffered from a bout of pneumonia and worked from my bed for most of the month. Even so, I managed 42 short stories, all fueled by Nyquil and desperation, totaling 107,000 words.

Bleakbourne front Cover medallion and dragon copyIncluded in this mess were ten dreadful poems, along with chapters 7 through 11 of Bleakbourne on Heath.

The following year began the same, this time with a severe case of bronchitis. I named my project November Tales 2016 – 30 Days of Madness and Pot Pies. I started by writing short stories, flash fiction, drabbles, and poems. Within five days, I was writing the first draft of a novel and managed to get 90,000 wonky, misspelled words.

That novel is still in the first draft stage, but I intend to finish it in this year’s NaNo rumble.

If you choose to join this writing free-for-all, go to www.nanowrimo.org and sign up! Pick your name, start your author profile, and look up dragon_fangirl (that’s me). Add me as your writing buddy, and I will be part of your writing posse, cheering you on when you need a morale boost.

3 Comments

Filed under writing

What is National Novel Writing Month, and should I participate? #NaNoWriMo

September is in full swing, and with it comes writers’ conferences. This last weekend, I attended the Southwest Washington Writers’ Conference in Centralia, Washington. I sat in on presentations by Lindsay Schopfer, Mellissa Hart, Elizabeth Goddard, and many other writers, all discussing the craft of writing. I also gave a small presentation on adding depth to our heroes and villains.

2020_nano_Project_coverConferences are excellent places to make good connections with other writers. You meet people you can talk to about every aspect of the experience of writing as well as craft. No one’s eyes glaze over when you try to explain your main character’s inner demons and you find people with struggles similar to your own.

You also meet industry professionals who will help you on your road to a finished project.

I have another conference in two weeks, this one in Seattle. After PNWA’s 2023 conference, I will plow through my notes for new info, as conferences always give me plenty of fodder for several blog posts.

September is also the time of year when I begin pulling together the characters and plot of my next novel. I’m a Municipal Liaison for NaNoWriMo (National Novel Writing Month).

If you haven’t heard of this, it’s a worldwide event taking place in November. Each year, thousands of people in all parts of the world dedicate themselves to writing a 50,000-word narrative in only thirty days.

NaNoWriMo is a contest in that you have achieved your goal if you write 50,000 words and have your word count validated through the national website. But it is not a contest in any other way as there are no monetary prizes or fame for those winners, only a PDF winner’s certificate that you can fill out and print to hang on your wall.

Depending on your intended audience, a manuscript of only 50,000 words is a short novel. It’s a good length for YA or romance but is only half a novel for epic fantasy or literary fiction.

nano-computer-word-count

November’s Goal

Regardless of the planned length of their finished novel, a dedicated author can get a book’s basic structure and storyline down in those thirty days. They sit for an hour or two each day and write at least 1667 words.

That’s all you need to do. At the end of 30 days, you will have written 50,000 words.

Author Lee French and I are co-MLs for the Olympia Region for NaNoWriMo. Every year, many writers in our area create profiles at www.nanowrimo.org and embark on the writer’s journey. Lee and I work together to ensure they have all the necessary tools and support to achieve their goals.

We’ve been doing this for a while and have seen a pattern among our writers. The first roadblock happens when reality sets in, and the writers realize that writing is work. This usually occurs within the first few days. A small percentage will never get more than 2,000 words written.

They discover writing isn’t their jam, after all.

The majority of new NaNo writers are people who “always wanted to write a book.” Often, they don’t know what they want to write and have no clue how to be disciplined enough to write any words, much less the number it takes to make a novel.

They start, get 30 to 1,000 words in, and realize they have nothing to say. But in our region, many people will reach the 10,000-word mark before they stop writing. That’s an achievement—it’s almost a novella.

NANO CrestSome new writers are completely fired up for their novels, obsessed. They go at it full tilt for a week or even two, and then, at the 20,000-word mark, they take a day off. Somehow, they never get back to it. These writers will continue to write off and on and may participate in NaNoWriMo again.

Even seasoned writers who have crossed the finish line at NaNoWriMo in previous years may find that the commitment to sit and write 1,667 words daily is not doable. Things come up—life happens, and it’s okay to set the writing aside. You can always come back to it later.

But by November 30th, a third of the writers in our region will make it to the 50,000-word mark. Some will reach above 80,000, and a few will exceed 100,000.

Some of these novels have complete story arcs and are ready for revisions. Most are not, but more work could make these proto-novels publishable.

It takes commitment and discipline to write 1,667 new words every day. You are not revising old work. Instead, you’re writing something new and not looking at what you wrote yesterday.

To do this, you must sit at the keyboard, open the document to where you left off, and begin writing forward. I have some tips and tricks to simplify this process, and we will discuss them later.

I’m not a good typist. The words that fall out of my head during NaNoWriMo are not all golden, just so you know. When writing stream-of-consciousness, many words will be garbled and miss-keyed.

This means that the revision process is a long and winding road for me.

I began writing Ruins of Abeyon, my forthcoming novel in November 2017, on the spur of the moment when I had a sudden flash of “what if.” I started with no outline, so the story arc evolved as I wrote the book. I listed the events in a separate document as I went. Later, when revising, it was easy to see the arc and make an outline. I could see when it was best to move certain events to more logical places and even when things needed to be cut.

Still, it has taken five years to get this book to where it is ready to be published.

Succeeding in writing even a short story gives one the confidence to continue.

If you have a novel in your soul and it’s bursting to get out, this might be your chance. However, planning for a successful NaNoWriMo is like preparing for a marathon.

We let our families know what we are planning well in advance and share how vital reaching our goal is to us. That way, we have their emotional support. We also plan ahead for meals and family time so the essential people in our lives aren’t neglected. In the US, this means fixing a Thanksgiving dinner on the last Thursday of November and enjoying the things that matter most.

Pumpkin-Pie-Whole-SliceCooking is my love language. I have many tips and ideas for getting word count and having a proper family feast. As a dedicated writer, I know how to plan for all aspects of life.

In many ways, we’re physically and mentally preparing for a marathon. We build our strength and get our families behind us by ensuring we have prepared well in advance.

Over the next few weeks, we will focus on laying the groundwork for our novels so that we will be ready and able to write when November comes.

Much of what I will discuss has emerged from my 13 years of experience and my co-ML Lee’s ideas for prep work.

I have made life-long friends through participating in my local NaNoWriMo group. The emphasis is on having fun and meeting personal goals, commiserating when goals can’t be met, and just enjoying the experience of creating something that is ours. We have the support and encouragement of the worldwide community of writers and people of all nations and walks of life.

Everyone has a story. Some people will write those stories, and I will be first in line at the eBook store, eager to read them.

NaNoWriMo-General-Flyer

3 Comments

Filed under writing

#FineArtFriday: Impression Sunrise by Claude Monet 1872, and the Fighting Temeraire by J.M.W. Turner 1839

Today I am featuring two famous paintings, Claude Monet’s Impression Sunrise, the painting that gave  a name to an entire movement withing the artistic community. But Monet was not the first of the impressionists, and he freely admitted that he was an admirer of the radical and oft criticized (in his time) J.M.W. Turner.  Indeed, during the years Monet resided in England, he visited the National Gallery, viewing the works of Turner, whom he held in high regard. The painting that, in my opinion, belongs in the same room with Impression Sunrise is turner’s masterpiece, the Fighting Temeraire.

Both paintings are best viewed from a distance, and both have power. Both tell a story, and both artists faced the slings and arrows of critics who were unwilling to accept anything that strayed from traditional portraiture and landscape art.

Uncaring of the critics, both Monet and Turner wandered off in their own artistic direction, and we can be grateful for that stubborn desire to paint what they felt as well as what they saw.

Turner’s work influenced Monet, and both artists influenced generations of artists who followed them.

Claude_Monet,_Impression,_soleil_levant

Artist   Claude Monet  (1840–1926) 

Title    Impression, Sunrise

Genre  marine art

Date    1872

Medium          oil on canvas

Dimensions     height: 48 cm (18.8 in); width: 63 cm (24.8 in)

Collection       Musée Marmottan Monet  

 

The_Fighting_Temeraire,_JMW_Turner,_National_Gallery

Artist:  J. M. W. Turner  (1775–1851)  (by Joseph Mallord William Turner)

Title: The Fighting Temeraire 1839

Description: The Fighting Temeraire tugged to her last berth to be broken up, 1838

Date: 1839

Medium: oil on canvas  

Dimensions: height: 90.7 cm (35.7 in)

Collection: National Gallery 


Credits and Attributions:

Impression Sunrise, Claude Monet 1872 [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons: Impression, Sunrise – Wikipedia accessed September 09, 2023.

The Fighting Temeraire, J. M. W. Turner: 1839 [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons: The Fighting Temeraire – Wikipedia accessed September 09, 2023.

3 Comments

Filed under #FineArtFriday

Guest Post: Five or six things I’ve learned by Stephen Swartz #amwriting

My dear friend, author Stephen Swartz, has kindly agreed to share some of his wisdom with us. Stephen is a fellow co-founder of Myrddin Publishing Group and is the author of eighteen novels. He writes in whatever genre suits his mood, and his work is always original and bold. So, without further yak-yak on my part, here is Stephen.

>>><<<

I’ve been asked to write about five or six things I’ve learned about being a so-called Indie author. Probably it will be closer to five than six, but no more than seven, unless I get inspired. Inspiration is the hardest part, however. That’s one thing.

guest_post_LIRF09052023How to get inspiration? That translates to getting a story idea. I used to think up nifty situations and wondered how an average person would deal with it. That’s the good ol’ what-if set-up you find mostly used in sci-fi stories. The problem with focusing on the cool idea is that usually the characters who have to deal with it become rather cardboard. That’s fine when you’re a young writer or producing a first draft. Slap it down and keep going. You can come back later to beef up the character, add description details, and so on. Whatever the idea is, get it out of your head at any cost.

I think a lot of new writers get hung up trying to write perfectly from the start. That will eat you alive, so stop doing that. Write whatever, as dumb or meaningless as it may come out of you. It won’t be the final version. You can fix it up later. I was already doing that when I came upon a quote (attributed to poet William Stafford), that goes a little bit like this: “When the writing gets hard, I lower my standards.” So I have a file of unfinished stories I dabble with whenever I need to work the gears a bit before I get to my serious writing – or when I hit a wall and need to pause before continuing the serious writing.

fluSeasonBookOfMomWhat is serious writing? Even if it’s comedy, it’s the writing you take seriously. What you want readers to admire, no matter the genre. That is all well and good, but you will find that what you think is good isn’t always what readers think is good. Got nothing to do with what you’re writing or how well you write it, it’s just the way it is. So don’t take yourself too seriously; you can take your writing seriously, of course. The idea is that the writing will get better for readers each time you go through a manuscript and revise and edit it. How many times you go through it is your decision. It helps to get someone else’s eyes on it at some point, especially if you are new at writing. You can look at a map but until you get to your destination you can’t be sure that map is accurate and you’re going the right way. Sounds like another thing I learned.

Characters are the bane of my existence, so I put them through Hell and only some come back. Can’t be afraid to bust some noses. We aren’t all Mary Sue and her pretty dolls to whom nothing even remotely bad ever happens. Real people are flawed, make mistakes, say stupid things, miss a lot, sin like there’s no tomorrow, take wrong turns, and get lost. They fret and regret and get down on themselves. You have to show all of that through description (body language, including nods and sighs) and dialog that matches the character. If writing in such a way that you can pop into the character’s head, you can slip in some thoughts and feelings and backstory to add richness to the character’s presence in the story. Every scene is an opportunity to broaden a character into a full-fledged person you’d want to sit down and have a cup of coffee with…right up until you kill ’em off. That’s the one big thing I learned in my long-ago MFA program in Creative Writing: interesting characters will draw your readers in better than a cool idea or weird setting.

fluSeason2I started reading a long time ago. Started writing soon after, making up my own stories which I thought were better than the ones I read. I borrowed here and there – and in later writing had to tone it down so as not to sound like the sources I borrowed from (sci-fi authors, mostly). You develop your own style eventually if you write enough. So write a lot; you don’t have to show it to anyone. I like to try writing in different styles, too. I like trying to have characters speak in different ways, some slang, vernacular, accents, different levels of education, just for my own amusement – which is cruel, I’ll admit. But trying different things is good for a writer. Read different styles, too, and try to imitate them. Read the juicy parts aloud, let them get stuck in your head. Consider what is special about the style the author uses. Compare and contrast with other authors you read, and with your own writing. Most of all, read a lot in different genre and different writing styles. How much you absorb from that differs for everyone, but try it.

You may hear about story arcs and how to outline a story (or novel) and think you have to do that, too. You don’t. Well, awrighty, if you read a lot then you don’t. You’ll pick up a sense of pacing from reading a lot, and you’ll know when to let things happen. It’s not a perfect system but, if you got it in you (i.e., a plot ‘clock’ ticking away, urging you to pull that trigger already) it’ll work. I seldom outline more than scribbling a few notes about what happens next. I do get to the middle and have to pause and look ahead to see how to get to the end, but that’s the fun part of writing. I know how the final scene will be usually by the time I’ve written a fifth of the way into the novel (about 20,000 words). I think I’ve changed what happens at the end only twice in 18 novels.

If it helps, think of a movie, the kind we find these days: the action hook, the backstory & character development, then we get on with the story, reach the mid-point, more action, crisis after crisis…. Well, you get to know what to expect every few moments. That’s not interesting. So shake it up. Sure, keep enough that it looks like it’s supposed to for the audience’s sake, but do some things differently for variety. Same with a book: keep enough of the genre features so that readers know what genre it is (maybe!) but change or add some things that keep the reader guessing. I like to mash-up my novels: two or more genre together. First of all, it’s simply more interesting for me to write. Second, I like for readers to get something unexpected (or so I’ve been told I tend to believe!). Like a crime thriller (my novel EXCHANGE) with that age-gap romance in the later chapters that turns creepy by the end. Didn’t see that coming, did you?

fluSeason3Finally you have a complete story (or novel) from beginning to end and the plot is satisfying, characters compelling, dialog crisp, and so on. What next? Read and revise at least three times, but put it away at least a few days between each reading (a month is optimal; go get some coffee). Yes, I know you’re eager to get into it again but make yourself wait. Go to your slush file and work on that erotica. Now back to your masterpiece. Try to read it as a reader who’s never seen it before: what would the average reader think and feel in this scene or on that page? You’re no longer thinking of how to write the story so now you focus on how someone you don’t know might understand it. (Sure, go ahead and correct those pesky mistypes as you find them. No rule saying you have to do that in a separate pass.) I like to look at scenes in isolation: every scene should do something, even if it is “only” showing a character’s personality. I read dialog aloud (or, recently, have my computer read it to me); I catch a lot of mistakes and sloppy or weak sentences that way. Run spellchecker until it’s about to fall off the rails but understand it is not actually reading and still will miss errors. You must read your manuscript with your own eyes and ears more than twice. Look for pet-peeve errors (e.g., I type ‘form’ a lot when I mean ‘from’; obviously the spellchecker will not catch it because ‘form’ is correctly spelled, just the wrong word). I run a search for them. Most importantly, never ever hit “replace all”!

I’ve lost count on the number of advice things. Maybe this is enough to get you started. Some is common sense, of course, some you’ve likely heard before. Much is just my personal routine which may or may not work for other writers. I know myself, my foibles and tendencies, so I can more or less keep them in check or know what to look for when editing. Know thy self is another advice thing.

Lastly, I think the two biggest flaws in the writing of “new authors” I have read are: 1) a dull story, and 2) a flat cast. In the MFA program I suffered through (that’s a separate blog post) the professor once told me, when a story I’d written wasn’t working: “Get a better idea.” Yes, there are some ideas that just don’t make good stories – or, in the alternative, you or I just can’t pull it off satisfactorily. Even with a good idea, a cast of characters that are like cardboard won’t keep a reader reading. Yes, it’s true, no matter how long I insisted. A good idea is only as good as the crafting of the story, that is, the writing itself. More than writing correctly, it should have a flavor, a style, a particular way of letting the words flow – and that is up to the author, perhaps with some help from the narrator.

In my most recent novels, FLU SEASON*, a trilogy focused on the hardships of a family trying to survive a 9-year pandemic and the lawlessness that follows, an autistic teen son narrates the first two books while his daughter narrates the third book. Each has a unique way of speaking which I let out freely, including poor grammar and Southern vernacular. It builds the personality of the character and adds flavor to the setting. They absolutely cannot, should not, speak with perfect grammar. As I work on a sequel to the trilogy, I have a character who has more education so he speaks with more correctness than those before him.

Now I’ve gone past my nap time. Add up the advice and it probably comes down to do your own thing, keep doing it, share as much as you are comfortable doing, and read a lot for ideas.


*FLU SEASON, a pandemic trilogy:

Book 1: The pandemic of 2020-22 has ended, but what if its worst days extended into 6 years? Follow autistic teen Sandy and his single Mom (& her tuba) as they flee a city in collapse for the hope of sanctuary with relatives, a plan which doesn’t succeed. (Nov. 2022)

Book 2: Sanctuary from a pandemic is only good if you can stay there. When Sandy and his young family are exiled from the island, he struggles to find a way to save them while they face the worsening situation. Without Mom to guide him, Sandy must take on all the responsibilities for survival in the lawless outerlands. (May 2023)

Book 3: There is no safe space – except maybe hiding away in the forest of a national park. But when others have the same idea, Sandy’s family faces a variety of opportunities and challenges. As the post-pandemic world recovers, it is his daughter who must carry the family forward, no matter the difficulties she and her sisters must face. (Sept. 2023)

You can read more about this trilogy here:
http://stephenswartz.blogspot.com/2023/08/flu-season-3-dawn-of-daughters.html

and here (with more about writing process):

http://stephenswartz.blogspot.com/2023/05/the-flu-season-trilogy-doing-what-i-do.html

About the Author

stephen-swartzStephen Swartz is the author of literary fiction, science fiction, fantasy, romance, and contemporary horror novels. While growing up in Kansas City, he dreamed of traveling the world. His novels feature exotic locations, foreign characters, and smatterings of other languages–strangers in strange lands. You get the idea: life imitating art.

After studying music and even composing a symphony, Stephen planned to be a music teacher before turning to fiction writing, and taught writing at a university in Oklahoma. Stephen Swartz has published poetry, stories, essays, and articles for scholarly journals in the U.S. and Japan

3 Comments

Filed under writing

#BookReview: Scrapings and Leavings by Dennis Mansker

I love short story collections. In high school, I could hardly wait for my father to finish his copy of the annual anthology of award-winning short stories. Some of the best work I have ever read has been in the form of short stories. George Saunders’s brilliant Tenth of December comes to mind.

But I don’t only read fantasy or science fiction. I read in all genres, and one recent compilation of short stories that I feel good about recommending is Scrapings and Leavings by Dennis Mansker. This collection includes stories and plays written over the course of many years. Each story or play offers the reader food for thought.

I liked that he included background as to why he chose the title and also why he wrote each story or play.

scrapings and leavings by dennis manskerMansker takes us into some of the darker days of the 1960s and 70s, sometimes introducing us to people we may not want to know and situations we don’t want to be in. Some protagonists are endearing, and some not so much—but all are intriguing, and all kept me reading.

The story that really stood out to me was My Summer of Crime. It details the youthful misadventures of Farnsworth, who later becomes the protagonist of his novel, A Bad Attitude, which is set during the Vietnam War.

You can find this book of short stories and Dennis Mansker’s other work at  Amazon.com: Dennis Mansker: books, biography, latest update.


About the Author

Dennis Mansker considers himself at 78 one of the latest of late bloomers. He published his first book, A Bad Attitude: A Novel from the Vietnam War, in 2002 at the age of 57. His second book, Scrapings and Leavings, will be published in 2023, and he is hard at work on his third book, Destiny in Dallas, which is on track to be published early in 2024.

Dennis Mansker author photoHe was born in Longview WA, spent five years on a dairy farm near Bristow OK, and is a 1973 graduate of Western Washington University in Bellingham WA.

He was drafted into the army in 1967, and spent nearly a year in Vietnam as company clerk of two US Army Transportation Corps trucking companies, an experience which formed the basis for the plot of his first book.

He retired after 31 years of state service with the Employment Security Department. He is responsible for producing four children, nine grandchildren and seven great-grandchildren (so far).

He lives in Olympia WA with his long-suffering wife Susan and two cats, who generously allow their humans to think that they are in charge.

Comments Off on #BookReview: Scrapings and Leavings by Dennis Mansker

Filed under writing

#FineArtFriday: A Storm in the Rocky Mountains – Mt. Rosalie by Albert Bierstadt 1866

Albert_Bierstadt_-_A_Storm_in_the_Rocky_Mountains,_Mt._Rosalie_-_Google_Art_ProjectArtist: Albert Bierstadt  (1830–1902)

Title: A Storm in the Rocky Mountains, Mt. Rosalie

Genre: landscape art

Date: 1866

Medium: oil on canvas

Dimensions: height: 210.8 cm (82.9 in); width: 361.3 cm (11.8 ft)

Collection: Brooklyn Museum: American Identities: A New Look, American Landscape, 5th Floor

What I love about this painting:

Albert Bierstadt painted his idea of what the American West of his time should be, grand, pristine, and wild. He painted what he saw, slightly fictionalized, so the viewer would see what he felt. He gave us entire stories on his canvas, epic explorations of the power and beauty of nature.

Bierstadt’s skies were imbued with high drama contrasted with peaceful vistas below. He took the places he had visited and made them bigger, grander, made the viewer feel the emotions he experienced when he first laid eyes on them.

About this painting via Wikipedia:

A Storm in the Rocky Mountains, Mt. Rosalie is an 1866 landscape oil painting by German-American painter Albert Bierstadt (1830-1902) which was inspired by sketches created on an 1863 expedition.

Bierstadt traveled to the Colorado Rocky Mountains where he was taken up to the Chicago Lakes beneath Mount Evans. The painting is named after Bierstadt’s mistress and, at the time, his friend’s wife, Rosalie Osborne Ludlow. The painting, measuring at 210.8 × 361.3 cm (83.0 × 142.2 in), is exhibited at the Brooklyn Museum, which acquired it in 1976.

The painting depicts Native American hunter/gatherers hunting deer in the foreground. A Native American encampment resides by a stream in the distance. The mountains are thrown into either sunlight or the darkness of a thunderstorm. In order to increase its dramatic value, Bierstadt exaggerated the scale of the Rocky Mountains.

Peering through a break in the clouds in the far distance is a snow-capped Mt. Rosalie, named after Bierstadt’s wife.

Upon its completion, the painting toured the United States for a year. On 7 February 1866, A Storm in the Rocky Mountains, Mount Rosalie exhibited for one day and evening at the Somerville Art Gallery in New York City as a benefit for the “Nursery and Child’s Hospital.” [1]

Quote from Wikimedia Commons: Albert Bierstadt enjoyed great success in the years surrounding the Civil War, producing finely detailed vistas of nature’s splendor in majestic canvases that were similarly invested with significance beyond their surface appearance.

The first technically advanced artist to portray the American West, Bierstadt offered to a rapidly transforming nation pictures whose spectacular size and fresh, dramatic subject matter supplied a visual correlative to notions of American exceptionalism, while also contributing to the developing concept of Manifest Destiny.

Trained in the highly finished manner of the Düsseldorf Academy, Bierstadt’s precise style imbued his works with a reassuring sense of veracity despite their sublime subjects and occasional liberties with geographic reality. [2]

About the Artist, via Wikipedia:

Albert Bierstadt (January 7, 1830 – February 18, 1902) was a German American painter best known for his lavish, sweeping landscapes of the American West. He joined several journeys of the Westward Expansion to paint the scenes. He was not the first artist to record the sites, but he was the foremost painter of them for the remainder of the 19th century.

Bierstadt was born in Prussia, but his family moved to the United States when he was one year old. He returned to study painting for several years in Düsseldorf. He became part of the second generation of the Hudson River School in New York, an informal group of like-minded painters who started painting along the Hudson River. Their style was based on carefully detailed paintings with romantic, almost glowing lighting, sometimes called luminism. Bierstadt was an important interpreter of the western landscape, and he is also grouped with the Rocky Mountain School.


Credits and Attributions:

Image: Wikimedia Commons contributors, ‘File:Albert Bierstadt – A Storm in the Rocky Mountains, Mt. Rosalie – Google Art Project.jpg’, Wikimedia Commons, 29 July 2023, 05:50 UTC, <https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Albert_Bierstadt_-_A_Storm_in_the_Rocky_Mountains,_Mt._Rosalie_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg&oldid=787844562> [accessed 1 September 2023]

[1] Wikipedia contributors, “A Storm in the Rocky Mountains, Mt. Rosalie,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Storm_in_the_Rocky_Mountains,_Mt._Rosalie&oldid=1160866547 (accessed September 1, 2023).

[2] Wikimedia Commons contributors, “File:1875, Bierstadt, Albert, Mount Adams, Washington.jpg,” Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:1875,_Bierstadt,_Albert,_Mount_Adams,_Washington.jpg&oldid=272380899 (accessed March 9, 2018).

2 Comments

Filed under #FineArtFriday

When life interferes with writing #amwriting

I have been prepping for NaNoWriMo 2023, trying to complete the outline so I can hit the ground running on November 1st. As always, I’m mentally committed to writing at least 1,667 (or more) new words every day during that writing rumble.

MyWritingLife2021By just doing that, I will have 50,000 (or more) words by midnight on November 30th.

Every year, I wonder how I’ll meet this goal. I don’t have a one-size-fits-all answer for that, as authors must be able to pay their bills, or no books will ever be written.

Sometimes, I feel guilty for taking the time to indulge in such a profoundly personal pleasure. It does take time. I tend to resent anything stopping me from having at least one hour of dedicated writing time each day.

But life tosses up roadblocks. We’re retired, and even so, keeping to a regular routine for writing is difficult. One would think we could do whatever we want and to heck with the world’s demands.

But life is not that way. Even people who are retired have obligations that take them away from home. Extra work and other activities that come along with living our lives take up space in our heads as well as the calendar. Finding the energy to be creative is a challenge.

When I was younger, I was a single parent. I had two jobs and children and sang in the choir at our church. I had many demands upon my time, but somehow, I always managed a little time for writing. Admittedly, it wasn’t much.

In those days, I wrote while my children were doing their homework. Sometimes I wrote for half an hour or so at night after they were asleep, pouring my angst into lyrics for songs. This is why my poetry has a more traditional rhyming rhythm. I’m a songwriter at heart, and there is always a melody in my head.

Everyone has a different creative process. What works in December might not work in April. When the tried-and-true fails, give yourself permission to change and find a way that works.

how-to-play-gin-rummy-1Be willing to be flexible. Do you work best in short bursts? Or, maybe you’re at your best when you have a long session of privacy and quiet time. Something in the middle, a melding of the two, works best for me.

But what if the way that worked last month no longer works? Varying my projects and writing in bursts broken up by daily activities works best for my schedule nowadays.

We must be open to finding the way that makes us feel productive, whether it works for someone else or not. We feel good when we’re productive.

I have my best ideas when I’m about to leave the house—no joke. If that is you too, do as I do and write those thoughts down. I keep a notebook around just for those moments.

You will be productive once you find your best style.

But first—you must give yourself permission to write.

I have plenty of downtime between my daily tasks. That is when I work on whatever revisions are needed. You would be amazed at what you can get done in ten-minute bursts.

We who wish to write must set aside time to do it. This allows us to be creative and still support our families, who all have activities and interests of their own.

As I have said many times before, being a writer is to be supremely selfish about every aspect of life, including family time.

ICountMyself-FriendsA good way to ensure you have that time is to encourage your family members to indulge in their own interests and artistic endeavors. That way, everyone can be creative in their own way during that hour, and they will understand why you value your writing time so much.

A balanced life is a happy one. Don’t become so obsessed with writing about fictional lives that you aren’t present in your own.

  • Some people manage to fit short bursts of writing into their daily schedule, writing at work during breaks or at lunch.
  • Others must schedule a dedicated block of time for writing, either rising two hours before they depart for work or skipping some TV in the evening.
  • Write in small increments—ten minutes here, half an hour there. These short bursts add up.

Perhaps your mind has gone blank. An idea is locked in your head, but you don’t have the words to free it. Step back and view your story from a distance:

  • Write several paragraphs detailing what must happen in your story, such as: Next morning, Stan arrives with the recruits. His drama ensues. Ends well, with Neela asking him to walk to the market with her.

Taking a break and doing something completely different is a good thing. When you return to writing, you may have nothing to add to the old project, but something new may be forming.

Write it.

I always have many manuscripts in the works because I come to a point where I begin flailing. I move between each project as I have inspiration for them. Right now, I have a short story, a novella, a novel in the final stage of editing, a novel at the halfway point, and this blog to keep me interested and writing something every day.

I am a slow keyboard jockey, and I can do about 1,100 wonky, misspelled words an hour during NaNoWriMo. Remember, misspelled or not, in NaNoWriMo every word counts and moves you closer to having a completed first draft. The important thing is to get the whole story down from the beginning to the end. Once that is done, you can fiddle with phrasing to your heart’s content.

My Coffee Cup © cjjasp 2013Writers and other artists do have to make some sacrifices for their craft. It’s just how things are. But don’t sacrifice your family for it.

If the urge to write is there, get up an hour early to have that quiet time. Or give up something ephemeral and unimportant, like one hour of TV.

I always encourage writers who are falling behind and unsure they can “do” NaNoWriMo to live their lives and write in short bursts during the moments between other things. We should write what we’re inspired to, and find the blessings in each day. If we do that, the words will come.

Happy writing!

13 Comments

Filed under writing

Guest post: Five Things I Learned While Writing Scrapings and Leavings by Dennis Mansker

Today I’m featuring a post by fellow author, Dennis Mansker. Dennis is one of the more interesting characters I’ve met in the local writing community. I have found his work to be intriguing and daring.

MyWritingLife2021BHis chosen genre is mainstream fiction, and the characters he presents are interesting and full of human frailties. So, without any more talk on my part, here is Dennis Mansker.

>>><<<

  1. The story sometimes writes itself; most of the time it doesn’t. But I am continually amazed at how … mystical … the writing process is. I can sit down with a loose idea for a story – I usually have a beginning and an end in mind, but the middle is a vague and nebulous fog. Two or three hours later I regain consciousness and have a finished story. How it got that way remains one of the great mysteries. Always be prepared for surprises. For example, “The Lolita of Rogue River” started out as a completely different story, but my characters kind of bullied me out of the way and took over. I’m glad that happened; the original story, when I finally wrested control back, turned out to be so lengthy and involved, with so many moving parts, that it is now going to be my next book, Destiny in Dallas.
  2. Character is everything. You can have a perfectly serviceable plot, but if your characters are wooden, are cardboard cutouts, are simulacra of real human beings, you really don’t have a story. That said, you may notice my intentional violation of this precept in a story or two in the book.
  3. scrapings and leavings by dennis manskerDid I mention be prepared for surprises? I can’t stress this too much. When I started what I call my New Wave of stories, in 2022, it wasn’t with the idea of collecting them in a book, but by the time I had written several of them and was reminded once again that the market for short stories was, to say the least, depressed, it dawned on me that if I collected what I considered the best of my previous stories along with the new ones, I had a book!
  4. Editing can be a bitch! No one wants to dismember his own children, but sometimes that’s what it feels like. Still, one needs to be ruthless, and sometimes no matter how much I may LOVE a story, it just doesn’t work. This is where friends come in. I put the manuscript out to three of my friends whose judgment I value, and took mostof their suggestions, even though it was painful. Some people like reading over their reviews on Amazon, some people don’t. Go ahead if you have a thick skin. I’ve gotten a few one-star reviews on Amazon for my first book, A Bad Attitude: A Novel from the Vietnam War, but these are far outweighed by the many four and five star reviews.
  5. You are never too old! I am at 78 among the very latest of late bloomers. Never give up! You are uniquely you. Make your voice heard!

>>><<<

Thank you for this fun and informative post, Dennis! Scrapings and Leavings will go live on September 1st but it is now available for preorder at Scrapings and Leavings – Kindle edition by Mansker, Dennis. Literature & Fiction Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.


Dennis Mansker author photoAbout the author: Dennis Mansker considers himself at 78 one of the latest of late bloomers. He published his first book, A Bad Attitude: A Novel from the Vietnam War, in 2002 at the age of 57. His second book, Scrapings and Leavings, will be published in 2023, and he is hard at work on his third book, Destiny in Dallas, which is on track to be published early in 2024.

He was born in Longview WA, spent five years on a dairy farm near Bristow OK, and is a 1973 graduate of Western Washington University in Bellingham WA.

He was drafted into the army in 1967, and spent nearly a year in Vietnam as company clerk of two US Army Transportation Corps trucking companies, an experience which formed the basis for the plot of his first book.

He retired after 31 years of state service with the Washington State Employment Security Department. He is responsible for producing four children, nine grandchildren and seven great-grandchildren (so far).

He lives in Olympia WA with his long-suffering wife Susan and two cats, who generously allow their humans to think that they are in charge.

Dennis Mansker at Amazon: Amazon.com: Dennis Mansker: books, biography, latest update

Comments Off on Guest post: Five Things I Learned While Writing Scrapings and Leavings by Dennis Mansker

Filed under Author Interviews, writing

#FineArtFriday: the Dragon’s Cave by Georg Janny 1917

Georg_Janny_-_The_Dragon's_Cave_1917Artist: Georg Janny  (1864–1935)

Title: The Dragon’s Cave (German: Drachenhöhle)

Date: 1917

Medium: oil on canvas

What I love about this painting:

What’s not to love about a dragon? Georg Janny gives us the beast in his natural environment. Our dragon is immense, gloriously armored with steel gray and silver scales. Twin streams of smoke rise from his nostrils, evidence of his fiery internal workings. The dragon sits at the entrance to his mountain aerie, surveying the world, and believes that he is the master.

I love fantasy paintings. The artists who painted scenery for the opera were, and are, incredibly skilled. The scenery painters of the early twentieth century were often influenced in their subject matter and style by the works of the pre-Raphaelites.

About the Artist, via Wikipedia:

Georg Janny (20 May 1864, Vienna – 21 February 1935, Vienna) was an Austrian landscape painter and set designer.

He worked as a scene painter in the studios of Carlo Brioschi and Johann Kautsky, alongside Alfons Mucha, and was a member of the Dürerbund.

In 1898, he participated in painting the “Eisernen Vorhang” (Iron Curtain) at the Vienna Volksoper for the 50th jubilee of Emperor Franz Joseph I. In 1904, he exhibited in the Austrian Pavilion at the St.Louis World’s Fair with scenes from the Imperial Royal Austrian State Railways (now at the Technisches Museum Wien). Two years later, he designed the stage for The Queen of Sheba by Karl Goldmark, one of the most popular operas of the late 19th century. Pictures from the second and third acts have been preserved.

He also painted landscapes and figures, including scenes from fairy-tales or imaginary worlds that are reminiscent of the works of Arnold Böcklin or Gustave Doré. [1]


Credits and Attributions:

Image: The Dragon’s Cave by Georg Janny. Wikimedia Commons contributors, “File:Georg Janny – The Dragon’s Cave 1917.jpg,” Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Georg_Janny_-_The_Dragon%27s_Cave_1917.jpg&oldid=636191261 (accessed August 25, 2023).

[1] Wikipedia contributors, “Georg Janny,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Georg_Janny&oldid=1159021400 (accessed August 25, 2023).

Wikimedia Commons contributors, “File:Georg Janny – The Dragon’s Cave 1917.jpg,” Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Georg_Janny_-_The_Dragon%27s_Cave_1917.jpg&oldid=636191261 (accessed August 25, 2023).

5 Comments

Filed under #FineArtFriday

Introspection, a critical aspect of pacing and character development #amwriting

Scenes involving violence can be tricky because we feel pressured to make the events the story, leading to undeveloped, two-dimensional characters.

depth-of-characterWe forget to consider how the action affects both the protagonist and the reader. The reader needs a small break between incidents to process what just happened, and the characters need a chance to regroup and make plans.

Pacing consists of action followed by aftermath, followed by action, followed by aftermath—and so on. This is often compared to how a skater crosses the ice: push, glide, push, glide.

When we insert a few quieter moments after the action, we create the places where conversations happen. When the characters pause to absorb what just happened and to consider the next step, background information emerges in an organic, natural way.

We want to keep the rhythm of the piece moving, but if we don’t allow the reader to process things, we risk losing them before they finish reading. The story becomes a wall of words and confusion, and they put the book down.

The story is the reader’s journey, and it is our job to make it a personal one.

We’re all familiar with the term ‘flatlined’ as a medical expression indicating the patient has died. Stories are composed of words strung together so the reader becomes emotionally involved in the arc of action. The reader stays involved when the plot arc moves forward at a good pace, but when it flatlines, the reader loses interest.

Plot-exists-to-reveal-characterStories are a balancing act detailing the lives of engaging characters having intriguing and believable adventures. The reader lives and processes the action as it happens, suspending their disbelief.

When the story arc is imbalanced, it can flatline in two ways:

  • The action becomes random, an onslaught of meaningless events that make no sense.
  • The pauses become halts, long passages of random interior monologues that have little to do with the action.

We want to meet and know the characters on both sides of the action, protagonist and antagonist, and we do this through their introspections.

The trick is balancing the introspection and chaos, ensuring your contemplation doesn’t turn into info dumps where your character ponders everything that happens to him at length.

Some stories are meant to be more reflective than active, and some of my favorite literary classics are all about the character’s thoughts as they go through the events. Yet, even though the stories might be about what goes on in the characters’ heads more than the adventure, these narratives are not repetitive. The action, mental though it is, moves forward rather than backward.

modesitt quote the times we live LIRF11012022But if you are writing genre fiction, the market you are writing for expects more action than introspection. These stories are also character-driven, but the adventure, how the protagonist meets and overcomes the battles and roadblocks, is what interests the reader.

So, a sci-fi action adventure would have more extended action scenes separated by short scenes of introspection and conversation.

One way to avoid a flatlined story arc is through character interaction. Your characters briefly discuss what is on their minds and bravely muck on to the next roadblock. Conversations serve two important (in my opinion) functions:

  • It tells us what they think. New information vital to the story emerges.
  • The reader sees who the characters are and how they think.

ICountMyself-FriendsConversations illuminate a group’s relationship with each other and sheds light on our characters’ fears. It shows that they are self-aware and should present information not previously discussed.

Interior monologues, or introspection, don’t have to be italicized if you make it clear that Character A is having a mental dialogue with themselves.

  • Interior monologues (thoughts) serve to illuminate a character’s motives at a particular moment in time.

However, interior monologues should not make our characters appear all-knowing. They must show that our people are somewhat clueless about their flaws, strengths, or even their deepest fears and goals.

Your point-of-view character will be in the most danger of this. Avoid situations where the dialogue is too exact in predictions and character self-analysis. Too much foreshadowing ruins the mystery of the piece. The same follows for inner monologues, perhaps even more so.

As the character is forced to grow throughout the course of the story, these faults emerge gradually. The protagonist is pushed down the path to wisdom. Self-awareness should flower because of the “personal resurrection” that occurs near the end of the hero’s journey.

Author-thoughtsGreat characters begin in an unfinished state, a pencil sketch, as it were. They emerge from the events of their journey in full color, fully realized in the multi-dimensional form in which you initially visualized them.

For the protagonist, surviving the journey to self-knowledge is as important as living through the physical journey.

The antagonist must also be self-aware. While their outcome may not be positive, their reasoning and ethical values should emerge as the story progresses.

But maybe you are writing an over-the-top story with a good vs. evil narrative. The supervillain’s backstory may not need more than a mention.

We need to know enough so the supervillain isn’t there simply for the sake of drama. We want them to present a real, tangible threat, and readers must see them as intelligent enough to be dangerous.

Character interactions should show that all the characters have depth. They have layers, and conversations and interior dialogues should reveal aspects the reader doesn’t know up front as the story progresses.

Repetition is easy to write into the first draft of the narrative because we’re telling ourselves the story as we write. But during revisions, we must focus on the rhythm of the story (pacing), as well as making the story arc logical.

It’s a balancing act, one that often takes many drafts for me to get right.

8 Comments

Filed under writing